Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Animal Overpopulation

What is animal overpopulation? There are many causes and consequences of this particular issue. Irresponsible breeding, non-neutered/non-spayed pets, and a growing population of stray animals are a few major causes of animal overpopulation. The result and consequence of animal overpopulation: an overwhelming number of homeless animals. 

Ever since I started volunteering at the WCAS, the reality of animal overpopulation hit me like a train with no breaks. I was completely unaware of the seriousness of this problem. In my personal opinion, animal population means that our society is not taking enough action in 1) the prevention of irresponsible breeding and 2) enforcing pet owners to neuter/spay their animals. If these two, major causes of animal overpopulation are heavily regulated, then there would not be as many homeless animals as there are today. Animal overpopulation is an issue that is overlooked by our society, but desperately needs to be talked about. Because this issue is overlooked, people are not being educated of what they can do to stop it and because people are not being educated about ways to put an end to animal overpopulation, society as a whole does not identify it as an important issue. I am only assuming this because I did not see it as an important issue before volunteering at the shelter. I didn't see a problem in breeding or choosing not to neuter/spay your pets because I was never properly educated on these issues. This makes me question, is society taking the appropriate steps to raise awareness and prevent these issues that result in animal overpopulation?

Fortunately, attempts are being made to combat this issue. House Bill 930, the Puppy Mill Bill, is "an act to establish standards of care for large commercial dog breeding facilities and to provide law enforcement with tools to ensure that dogs at those facilities are treated humanely" (http://ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/House/PDF/H930v0.pdf). This bill presents a list of rules that must be followed by large commercial dog breeding facilities. Although I am pleased that this bill legally restricts irresponsible breeding, one aspect of the bill has left me a bit unsatisfied: "Any person who owns, has custody of, or maintains 10 or more female dogs over the age of six months that are capable of reproduction and kept primarily for the purpose of breeding and selling the offspring as pets shall provide the following for each dog owned, kept, or maintained by that person." This Puppy Mill Bill specifically defines what a "large breeding facility" is. What about the irresponsible breeders who are disobeying all of these requirements but are safe from the law because they only have 6 female breeding dogs? Why does this bill only focus on the "large commercial" breeding facilities? The American Kennel Club opposes this bill and makes a good argument that the basic standards of care should apply to ALL dogs: "This bill only applies standards of care to those who meet this misleading definition of "large commercial dog breeder"...If the purpose of this measure is truly to improve the wellbeing of dogs, then it doesn't make sense to limit these standards of care to only those who own 10 or more intact female dogs" (http://www.wral.com/asset/news/state/nccapitol/2013/05/08/12425852/HB_930_Talking_Points-_On_Letterhead-_May_7_2013.pdf).

Although I would like to make some alterations to the House Bill 930, I still support its intentions of helping animals in need and curbing the issue of animal overpopulation. People, like the American Kennel Club may label this as an unsuccessful attempt, but as long as awareness is being raised and animals are being saved, every attempt is successful. Each effort put into action will take us one step closer to our ultimate goal(s): curbing animal overpopulation and the causes and consequences it's tied to.

All of the animals in these images have been at one point or still are homeless due to animal overpopulation:


Casa Blanca. ID#86658.
Simone. ID#88289.
Beauty. ID#87498.

Diesel. ID#89472.

Icelandic Breeze. ID#89499.

Leonard. ID#88682.
Chops. ID#44295.

King. ID#82176.
Tucker. ID#88031.
Emerson. ID#68687.

Mama Mia. ID#87648.


7 comments:

  1. Hey Pauline, I just want to say that I think that you have hit the nail on the head with what you said in this post. It isn't that too many people don't care about animal overpopulation, it's that they just don't know. I have always been aware that the shelter's job was to take in animals that no one wants and strays and other similar animals; however I never knew the extent of animals being euthanized because of overpopulation. I didn't know either about how big a part of it that spade and neutering is, I always that it was just a personal choice of pet owners. Maybe what this problem really needs more than anything is more education towards the general public.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YES! More education is exactly what this society needs :). Thanks for the comment, Lauren. I'm glad that both of us have learned something valuable about animal population from this course!

      Delete
  2. Pauline, I love the images you posted because there are is a variety of techniques you used. Also the post really reflects the love you have for these animals and the interest that has increased with the time you have volunteered at the shelter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Britany! It's true that this interest has grown since we started volunteering at the shelter. I'm glad it's showing through my pictures :)

      Delete
  3. Pauline, I definitely agree with you on the bill. It isn't very satisfying, but the fact that it is raising some awareness is better than it not being sent in at all. Sometimes small steps have to be taken to achieve the end goal, especially when most of us don't understand the issue (as you discussed).

    I'm so happy that you've become more passionate about the issue the more you learned about it. I hope that with more educational awareness efforts, our society will become passionate about the issue too.

    Also, wonderful pictures. All of the dogs look so content to have you photograph them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment, Katie! "Sometimes small steps have to be taken to achieve the end goal..." Nicely said! I'm glad I'm not alone in my opinions of the bill. Thank you for your encouraging words, especially the comment about the dogs looking content. They're actually just looking at the treats I'm holding above my camera lens (haha).

      Delete
  4. Very well said, and well reasoned. I am glad you have dissected the bill, and applied your critical thinking to where you think it is lacking. Very strong post.

    ReplyDelete